Anti-dilution provisions are the preferred-stock rights that adjust a series' conversion price downward if the company later issues stock at a lower price. They protect investors from being economically diluted by down rounds, with two main structural flavors: weighted-average (founder-friendly) and full-ratchet (punitive). It is one of the most economically significant terms in the preferred stock package, and the choice between flavors materially affects founder and common-holder outcomes when the company has to raise at a lower price.
The two structural flavors:
Concrete example: company raised Series A at $10/share with 10M shares outstanding. Three years later, they raise a Series B at $5/share, issuing 2M new shares.
Standard exclusions (carve-outs): most anti-dilution provisions exclude option pool issuances to employees, shares issued in M&A, shares issued for strategic partnerships, shares issued upon conversion of existing convertibles, and shares issued under existing warrants. Pay-to-play: some anti-dilution provisions include pay-to-play language requiring preferred holders to participate in the down round to maintain their anti-dilution protection, creating pressure on existing investors to follow on.
Anti-dilution is the preferred provision that does its real work when things go badly. In a flat or up environment, it doesn't activate. In a down round, it determines whether the founder team gets diluted modestly (broad-based weighted-average) or savaged (full-ratchet). The right discipline at term sheet time: insist on broad-based weighted-average, push for the standard carve-outs (option pool, M&A, partnerships), and resist any narrowing of the carve-outs. Full-ratchet is the term you walk away from unless you're in a distressed financing where it's the price of survival. Even then, model out what it actually does to your ownership before you sign. The math is uglier than the term sheet language suggests.
What founders get wrong: Accepting full-ratchet because they're confident they'll never raise a down round. Most founders who eventually take a down round were confident at the prior round that they wouldn't. The point of anti-dilution provisions is to govern the scenarios you're hoping to avoid; the worst time to discover you accepted full-ratchet is when the down round closes and you watch your ownership get cut in half for a small bridge of capital. Negotiate for broad-based weighted-average at every priced round; the modest cost (a tougher conversation at the term sheet) is dwarfed by the protection if the worst case shows up.
Related: Preferred Stock · Weighted-Average Anti-Dilution · Full-Ratchet Anti-Dilution · Broad-Based Weighted-Average · Down Round
What are anti-dilution provisions?
Contractual rights attached to preferred stock that adjust the conversion price downward (resulting in more common shares per preferred upon conversion) if the company later issues stock at a price lower than what the preferred holder paid. Protects investors from economic dilution in down rounds.
What's the difference between weighted-average and full-ratchet?
Weighted-average produces a partial adjustment based on the size of the down round relative to the total cap table (founder-friendly). Full-ratchet resets the conversion price all the way to the new (lower) price regardless of round size (investor-friendly, punitive to common).
Is anti-dilution standard in venture rounds?
Yes. Almost every priced venture round includes anti-dilution provisions on the preferred. The modern standard is broad-based weighted-average with carve-outs for option pool, M&A, partnerships, and pre-existing convertibles. Full-ratchet appears in down rounds, distressed financings, and aggressive structured deals; founders should resist it.
This is just a small sample! Register to unlock our in-depth courses, hundreds of video courses, and a library of playbooks and articles to grow your startup fast. Let us Let us show you!
Submission confirms agreement to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.