Having raised over $100 million in angel and VC funding for startups I've founded and a couple others I've advised, I have some related experience in addressing this question.

The company you outlined above seems more like an angel or friends and family deal for a lifestyle business than a VC financing round for a technology startup.

VC's want to see a billion dollar market opportunity potential, and a company that has a chance of reaching at least $100 million in revenue by year 5.

I'd be happy to talk further with you about fundraising options if you'd like to give me a call sometime.

Wow, sounds like you have an amazing profit margin. The key is GROWTH. Continuous and stable, with the ability to predict future growth.

Therefore, your market niche is very important, to feed the growth curve within an order of magnitude and can't be too vague.

As others have mentioned, investors look for a $100-200 million valuation potential, as well as the ability to morph or expand as needed.

Contact me if you want to discuss more.

Potential is relative but PREPARATION IS KEY. You need to be able to understand the vision for the company. I usually tell other entrepreneurs like me to stop calling your company a "startup" and start treating it as a business.

From this point of view, you should have done research on your market. If you've completed a beta test, that's even better. It takes time. Don't go to VCs with just the "idea of being the NEXT BIG THING."

NO.

You have a "million-dollar idea?" Well, prove it.

From the presentation, to market research to connections, you should be able to relay your vision in a clear manner.

If you need more help in organizing these things, you can schedule a call with me.

Likely best you look through docs on various VC Websites (there are many).

If you have a flow of investment (say for example in traffic) + a flow of sales, so there's a consistent ROI over some period of months, you'll attract far more capitol + have to give away less of your company.

Most VCs I know will be way more interested in consistent, proven ROI (even if total revenue is small), than estimates on paper.

1. If you are growing by 2,000 users or $1,000 per month.
2. If you have a very high tech idea and are a very good marketer, such as Theranos, Magic Leap, Tesla.

But you should normally start with Angel Funding. VCs aren't suitable for pre-traction startups for a multitude of reasons.

More the better. Depends how you define value too. A speculative value will always be laughed at compared to real traction value. Traction will always get attention and demand respect.

There is no one right answer, truth be told different investors are going to be looking for different things. There is one key thing i noticed you said though and that is attract. Using the word attract means VC's would be approaching you versus you pitching them. If you want to attract attention you have two options.

1. Get in someone's eco-system, haven something they need, want or love; then you can attract attention. 2. Be outside there eco-system and be some wonderful they search for something like you.

Again, they are two very different opposing views. If you want to attract attention, it comes down to how well are you selling yourself. If you want a certain valuation, it comes down to how well you sell the idea, backed with unemotional market research (What's your business model? How do you see future growth? What's your risk? Where are you to date? What do you need this money for? How will this money accelerate your growth? How will you return my money?)

Reach out to me for more clarity on the subject, I would love to help you.

Different Venture Capital firms have different criteria on when they allocate funding. Some come in at a pre-seed or seed stage where all you are is an idea on a paper. If you do a search for VC incubator or VC seed you will get a more readily available selection of where to go. Most VC's raise money from wealthy investors, endowments, and other corporate investors. A lot of these have started to set up their own direct investment platform and act as their own VC's. Feel free to reach out as there are many other alternative financing platforms out there to fund startups.

I have 25 years of experience working with early stage technology companies and investors.

I’m often asked about fundraising strategies for VC funds and angel investors. After raising capital and exiting from multiple startups and investing through 15 venture funds and dozens of angel investments I have seen thousands of deals.

Since you are already generating some initial revenue from paid advertisers, it sounds like it is the right time to put together a plan to raise your seed round of capital.

I’ve found that the most productive use of time for both of us is scheduling a call through my profile.

Hmm... if I have such a good profit margin, I will not look for any funding - I feel this is funny. Just within one year I will have more than $8 million to spend, there aren't so many Startups need billions dollar at start, this is not a oil refinery to building aircraft.

Now I do consider a need for funding if all the above are just forecast and there is a need of money to develop the subscription model and marketing activities.

There is no clear answer, it depends the current development ... normally engage a valuer is a good approach, but the VC needs to accept it (this is based on my 20 years in valuing the companies). Normally, the funding can be structured as a project, entity or combined and can be loan, entity or combined too.

Hope the above helpful to you

A business of the size you described is most likely not of interest to a VC firm. You would be far better off focusing on angel investors or family offices that manage their own capital.

Venture capitalists are looking for places to deploy a large amount of capital with the potential for follow on investments and grand slam outcomes. Each deal costs them money in due diligence, support, legal costs and more. Investing $1 million each in 100 companies would be far less desirable than investing $10 million in 10 companies. This is why most VCs do not participate in seed rounds, even if they say they do.

In general, VCs are going to want your round to be upward of $2M in a Series A, and they will want to own no less than 20-30% of your company for it to be interesting to them. That means your company would need to be worth about $6-10 million prior to their investment with the potential to grow 10-100X that size.

Most companies are not investable and focusing on investment unsuccessfully can eat up a lot of time and resources. If you want to talk about whether your company is investable, please reach out.

Well that's a very good question . Actually attracting the venture capital funding is not so easy as many think . Because there are lot of things one should ensure so that they get funding from venture capitalists. As they are going to pour their money into your company they also look into many things while investing in your company. First of all inorder to get Funding successfully you need to prove them how successful your idea can be if implemented . Right way of pitching is also very important in order to get funding from venture capitalists.
You can call me to know the effective pitching ways to get funding from venture capitalists

A startup would need to demonstrate a potential value in excess of $9.5 million to attract VC funding under these conditions.

The potential value that a startup needs to have in order to attract VC funding can vary widely depending on a range of factors, including the industry, the stage of the company, and the specific investment thesis of the VC firm. Generally speaking, VCs are looking for startups that have the potential to generate significant returns on their investment, typically through a future exit such as an IPO or acquisition.

For early-stage startups, VC firms may be looking for potential valuations of $10 million or less, while later-stage startups may need to demonstrate the potential for valuations in excess of $100 million. However, it's important to note that valuations are just one factor that VCs consider when evaluating potential investments. Other factors, such as the team's expertise, market traction, and revenue potential, may also be critical in attracting VC funding.

Ultimately, the potential value of a startup will depend on a range of factors, including the company's growth prospects, competitive landscape, and the investment climate at the time of fundraising. Startups that can demonstrate strong growth potential and a clear path to profitability are likely to be more attractive to VC firms and may be able to secure funding at higher valuations.

The potential value required to attract venture capital (VC) funding can vary on various factors, like industry, growth potential, and the specific investment theory of the venture capital firm. Here are a few considerations:
1)The startup's value proposition, differentiation, or disruptive potential are crucial factors in attracting VC interest.
2)VCs typically prioritize startups that have the potential for rapid scalability and significant growth.
3)VCs are interested in startups that can address larger market needs or disrupt existing markets.
It's important to note that each VC firm may have different investment criteria and preferences.

The potential value a startup needs to attract VC funding can vary depending on several factors, including the industry, growth potential, and the specific investment criteria of VC firms. While there is no fixed threshold, I can provide some general considerations based on the example you provided:

1. Market Opportunity: Although a market size of $150,000 in annual revenue may be relatively small, VC firms may still consider investing if the startup can demonstrate a compelling value proposition and a clear plan to capture a significant share of the market. The startup would need to present a strong case for why it can effectively target and expand its customer base to generate substantial growth.

2. Revenue Potential: In the example you provided, with a maximum annual revenue of $9 million, the startup may need to convince investors that it can achieve and sustain such revenue levels. VCs often look for startups with the potential to scale rapidly and generate significant returns on investment. The startup should highlight factors such as customer acquisition strategies, retention rates, and potential upsell or cross-sell opportunities to showcase their revenue growth potential.

3. Cost Structure: With estimated costs of less than $500,000 annually, the startup would need to demonstrate that their cost structure is manageable and scalable. Efficient cost management and the ability to scale operations without incurring disproportionate expenses are important considerations for VCs.

4. Profitability and Financial Projections: While profitability is not always a prerequisite for VC funding, the startup should present a clear path to profitability and a compelling financial projection that showcases the potential for positive cash flow and returns on investment. This can include demonstrating how they plan to increase revenue, control costs, and achieve profitability within a reasonable timeframe.

It's worth noting that the specific circumstances, growth potential, and competitive landscape of the startup will heavily influence VC interest. Additionally, VC firms may have different investment criteria and preferences. It's important for startups to conduct thorough research, build a strong business case, and tailor their pitch to target investors who have a track record of investing in their industry and stage of development.

There's no definitive minimum potential value that a startup needs to attract VC funding, as VCs evaluate many qualitative factors beyond just revenue projections. However, here are some general guidelines based on your example:

A market size of $9 million annually could be considered on the smaller side for a Series A. VCs typically want to see a $50 million+ total addressable market.

An annual revenue run rate of less than $1 million would make it difficult to attract VC interest at an early stage, all else being equal. They want demonstrated traction.

Gross margins of over 50% are generally expected to show the business can scale profitably. Your estimated costs of <$500K point to good margins.

estimated 3-5x revenue multiple on exit. So a $9 million revenue company could exit for $27-45 million. This may or may not meet VC return thresholds.

Competitive advantage and barriers to entry are important since the market is smaller. Proprietary technology or a strong moat could offset the size.

Founding team experience is also a factor. First-time entrepreneurs face higher hurdles generally.

Angel/seed funding history shows the ability to hit milestones and de-risk the opportunity.

While your numbers alone may not wow top VC firms, there's a chance an angel or smaller fund could take interest if other qualities like teamwork, tech, and marketing strategy are strong. Hitting $2–3 million+ in annual recurring revenue would make the profile much more VC-friendly.