International equity grants are equity awards granted to employees and contractors located outside the United States. They involve significant complexity from country-by-country differences in tax treatment, securities laws, employment laws, currency, and reporting, typically requiring per-country analysis and often country-specific sub-plans or alternative structures such as phantom equity. It's the area where US-default thinking creates expensive surprises.
The complexity dimensions:
Tax treatment (varies by country):
Securities laws (registration vs. exemption):
Employment law:
Currency:
Reporting requirements:
Common structures:
Direct grant under US plan: simplest but often suboptimal. Treats foreign grantees same as US employees under US plan terms.
Country sub-plans: country-specific addenda to US plan with country-specific terms (tax-favored treatment, etc.).
Alternative equity (where direct grants problematic):
EOR/PEO arrangements: Employer of Record (Deel, Remote.com, etc.) employs the person; company contracts with EOR. Equity grants still require structuring.
Common pitfalls:
Default US treatment: granting same terms as US employees in countries where it's suboptimal or invalid.
Tax surprises: foreign employees discovering at exercise/vesting that tax treatment is different and worse than expected.
Securities violations: granting without country-specific exemption or registration.
Employment law exposure: equity grants creating unexpected employment obligations.
Currency mismatch: USD-denominated grants in highly inflationary currencies.
When to engage international equity advisors:
First international hire: get advice before granting equity to anyone outside US.
Multiple country expansion: country-specific plans typically warrant outside counsel.
Major exit event: international tax planning for liquidity events.
Granting US-default options to a foreign employee is how you hand someone a tax surprise and yourself a securities problem. Before your first foreign grant, get international equity counsel and look at country-specific sub-plans or alternative structures. Make sure both you and the grantee actually understand the tax treatment, not just the strike price. Use cap-table software that handles international (Carta is decent here). This is the opposite of a thing to wing.
What founders get wrong: Granting US-default equity to foreign employees without country-specific analysis, then facing tax, securities, and employment law issues. The right discipline: per-country analysis; country-specific structuring; alternative compensation where appropriate.
Related: Stock Option · RSUs · Employee Equity · Equity Incentive Plan · Employer of Record
What are international equity grants?
Equity awards (stock options, RSUs, restricted stock) granted to employees and contractors located outside the United States. Significant complexity arises from country-by-country differences in tax treatment, securities laws, employment laws, currency, and reporting.
Why are international equity grants complex?
Tax treatment varies by country (some tax at grant, others at vesting, exercise, or sale). Securities laws require country-specific registration or exemption (US Rule 701 doesn't apply abroad). Employment laws may treat equity as employment compensation. Currency mismatches add complexity.
How should startups structure international equity?
Engage international equity counsel before first foreign grant. Consider country-specific sub-plans, alternative structures (phantom equity, SARs), or working through EOR/PEO. Use cap table software with international support (Carta). Don't default to US treatment.
This is just a small sample! Register to unlock our in-depth courses, hundreds of video courses, and a library of playbooks and articles to grow your startup fast. Let us Let us show you!
Submission confirms agreement to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.