The COO (Chief Operating Officer) is the senior executive responsible for running operational execution across the company's functions. The specific scope varies significantly by company depending on what the CEO chooses to delegate and what the company structurally needs. The COO often serves as the CEO's right-hand operator and integrator across departments (sales, marketing, customer success, finance, HR, sometimes engineering) rather than running any single function. The role is highly contextual rather than universally present at venture-backed startups; many successful companies operate without a COO at all. It is the most variable and contested of the C-suite roles, with no consensus definition and significant variability in actual responsibilities.
The contexts where COO roles make sense:
Founder-COO as CEO complement: when there are two co-founders with complementary skills (often a "visionary" CEO and an "operator" COO), the COO runs day-to-day operations while the CEO focuses on external relationships (investors, customers, strategic vision). Famous examples: Larry Page (CEO) and Sergey Brin (informally COO-like) at Google; Marc Benioff (CEO) and Parker Harris (CTO/operator) at Salesforce; many other partnerships where the founders explicitly divide CEO/COO responsibilities.
Hired COO as operational scaling support: companies at scale-up phase (typically Series C+) sometimes hire experienced COOs to bring operational rigor that the founder-CEO doesn't have or doesn't want to develop. The COO runs the operational engine while the CEO focuses on strategy, fundraising, and external relationships.
Functional-specific COO: at some companies, the COO has a specific operational scope (e.g., go-to-market COO running sales/marketing/customer success; or operations COO running supply chain, manufacturing, fulfillment) rather than running everything operational.
Where COO roles often don't make sense:
The COO vs CEO dynamic: the most-successful COO arrangements involve clear delineation between CEO and COO responsibilities and high trust between the two. The most-troubled COO arrangements involve ambiguity ("are you running operations or am I?"), competition for credit, or fundamentally different views on operational priorities. Hiring an external COO is one of the higher-risk executive hires because the role definition is so variable and the working relationship with the CEO is so crucial.
The COO succession path: at many companies, the COO is positioned as a potential CEO successor. When the founder-CEO eventually steps down (voluntarily or otherwise), the COO often becomes the natural candidate to step into CEO. This dynamic creates both alignment (COO is incentivized to make CEO successful) and potential conflict (COO may have different views on strategy that surface during succession discussions).
COO is the most overrated job title in startup land and the one founders most often want without clearly needing. The right question to ask: what specific operational gaps am I trying to fill, and is a COO the right structure for filling them? Often the answer is "no, what I need is a strong VP Engineering, VP Sales, or Chief of Staff." Adding a COO when you actually need a specialized executive creates ambiguity and slows decision-making. Where COOs work well: as part of a founder team where two complementary founders explicitly divide CEO/operator roles; at scale-up companies where the founder-CEO wants to focus on strategy and fundraising while someone else runs the operational engine. Where COOs don't work well: small teams that don't need the role, companies with strong functional VPs, and companies hiring "an experienced operator" without clear scope. Hire what you actually need, not what seems like the right title.
What founders get wrong: Hiring a COO without clearly defining what the COO will own vs what the CEO and functional VPs own. Ambiguous COO roles consistently create org friction, decision-making confusion, and frustration. The right discipline: before hiring a COO, write down precisely what the COO will own, what they'll have authority over, and how they'll work with the CEO and functional VPs. If you can't write that down clearly, you don't need a COO; you need to clarify what operational gap you're trying to fill and hire the right specialist for that gap.
Related: CEO · Founder · Chief of Staff · VP Engineering · VP Sales
What does a COO do?
A senior executive responsible for running operational execution across the company's functions, with the specific scope varying significantly by company. Often serves as the CEO's right-hand operator and integrator across departments rather than running any single function. The role is highly contextual rather than universally present at venture-backed startups.
When should a startup hire a COO?
When there's a clear operational gap that a single integrator role can fill better than specialized VP-level leaders. The triggers: founder-CEO wants to focus on strategy/fundraising and needs an operational counterpart, complex operations spanning multiple functions need single-point coordination, or a founder team has natural CEO/COO complementarity from day one. Hire only after clearly defining the role.
Why don't all companies have COOs?
Because the role is contextual rather than universally needed. Small teams don't need the role; companies with strong functional VPs don't need an additional integrator layer; highly product-focused tech companies handle most operations through CTO and VP Engineering. Adding a COO when not needed creates ambiguity rather than value.
This is just a small sample! Register to unlock our in-depth courses, hundreds of video courses, and a library of playbooks and articles to grow your startup fast. Let us Let us show you!
Submission confirms agreement to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.