Before you read my answer, you should know I’ve raised in consumer and DTC before with success, so I’m going to give you the same honest feedback I’d give any founder sitting across the table from me.
Putting 85% of a pre-seed raise into ads for an AI/smart-fabrics brand is extremely high. You already have pre-orders, which tells me there’s at least some initial consumer interest. But spending nearly everything on paid acquisition before the product, margins, supply chain, or actual IP are built out is backwards. Investors don’t get confidence from a massive ad budget -- they get confidence from clarity around the product itself, your economics, repeatability, and what makes this brand defensible.
The bigger issue is that your current setup doesn’t match the ambition of the pitch. I looked at your site, and what I see today looks much more like an early apparel brand with Printful fulfillment and “AI” language layered on top. Nothing wrong with starting lean, but it does raise a very real question: what exactly requires $100K–$500K right now?
Reaching profitability with Shopify + POD doesn’t require fundraising. If anything, telling investors you want to put almost the entire raise into marketing while not putting capital into development, production, or infrastructure would make most of them pause. They want to know what their dollars are actually building, not how many impressions you can buy.
Your pre-orders and influencer network are helpful signals, but they don’t convert into a case for a large ad-heavy round. They convert into a case for proving the product works, the economics work, and the customer experience works -- then scaling it.
Asking whether capital “should” go into ads or ops is the wrong framing. The real question investors will ask is:
“What risks are you removing with this money?”
Paid ads don’t remove risk -- they accelerate whatever state the business is already in. If the foundation is unproven, ads just amplify that uncertainty faster.
If you want more investor confidence, your raise structure needs to make it clear that the money goes toward actually building the brand you’re pitching -- product development, refinement, supply chain reliability, content that establishes the brand world, and the operational backbone that supports all of it. Marketing comes after those pieces are nailed, not before.
Subject: How should I structure a $100K–$500K seed raise for my AI-driven luxury brand to maximize growth and investor confidence? Attachment: GroupPost #f32a9f22-d11d-4b0a-89a9-5d3549a9cbd2
Before you read my answer, you should know I’ve raised in consumer and DTC before with success, so I’m going to give you the same honest feedback I’d give any founder sitting across the table from me.
Putting 85% of a pre-seed raise into ads for an AI/smart-fabrics brand is extremely high. You already have pre-orders, which tells me there’s at least some initial consumer interest. But spending nearly everything on paid acquisition before the product, margins, supply chain, or actual IP are built out is backwards. Investors don’t get confidence from a massive ad budget -- they get confidence from clarity around the product itself, your economics, repeatability, and what makes this brand defensible.
The bigger issue is that your current setup doesn’t match the ambition of the pitch. I looked at your site, and what I see today looks much more like an early apparel brand with Printful fulfillment and “AI” language layered on top. Nothing wrong with starting lean, but it does raise a very real question: what exactly requires $100K–$500K right now?
Reaching profitability with Shopify + POD doesn’t require fundraising. If anything, telling investors you want to put almost the entire raise into marketing while not putting capital into development, production, or infrastructure would make most of them pause. They want to know what their dollars are actually building, not how many impressions you can buy.
Your pre-orders and influencer network are helpful signals, but they don’t convert into a case for a large ad-heavy round. They convert into a case for proving the product works, the economics work, and the customer experience works -- then scaling it.
Asking whether capital “should” go into ads or ops is the wrong framing. The real question investors will ask is:
“What risks are you removing with this money?”
Paid ads don’t remove risk -- they accelerate whatever state the business is already in. If the foundation is unproven, ads just amplify that uncertainty faster.
If you want more investor confidence, your raise structure needs to make it clear that the money goes toward actually building the brand you’re pitching -- product development, refinement, supply chain reliability, content that establishes the brand world, and the operational backbone that supports all of it. Marketing comes after those pieces are nailed, not before.